Skip to main content
All CollectionsHelp CenterReport
ACMG-AMP Guidelines as standard for molecular profiling data interpretation on OncoDNA platforms
ACMG-AMP Guidelines as standard for molecular profiling data interpretation on OncoDNA platforms

OncoKDM / MERCURY interpretations use ACMG-AMP-based guidelines

Aubray Prévot avatar
Written by Aubray Prévot
Updated over a week ago

At OncoDNA it has been consensually chosen to follow ACMG-AMP guidelines to classify actionable variants by biological and therapeutical impacts.

Biological classes

There is a general consensus to use these 5 biological classes:

- Pathogenic

- Probably (likely) pathogenic

- VUS

- Probably (likely) benign

- Benign

This classification is based on the ACMG and AMP Standards and Guidelines publication of Richards et al. Genet Med 2015, even though these guidelines are meant for germline variants. Read also https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4544753/

Therapeutical classes

TIER I:

Level A:

1. Biomarkers that predict response or resistance to FDA-approved therapies for a specific type of tumor

2. Biomarkers included in professional guidelines that predict response or resistance to therapies for a specific type of tumor

Level B:

Biomarkers that predict response or resistance to therapies for a specific type of tumor based on well-powered studies with consensus from experts in the field

TIER II:

Level C:

1. Biomarkers that predict response or resistance to therapies approved by the FDA or professional societies for a different type of tumor

2. Biomarkers that serve as inclusion criteria for clinical trials

Level D:

Biomarkers that show plausible therapeutic significance based on preclinical studies

TIER III:

Variants of uncertain (or unknown) significance (VUS)

TIER IV:

Likely Benign / Benign

Did this answer your question?